Sudan has accused the United Arab Emirates of direct responsibility for the ongoing conflict, with an ambassador stating that the Abu Dhabi government is accountable for the violence and humanitarian crisis. The ambassador directly attributed all "spilled blood, innocent lives lost, and women subjected to rape" to the Abu Dhabi government, holding it responsible for these profound human tragedies. The ambassador claimed that a "terrorist militia" is responsible for the deteriorating security and humanitarian situation in Sudan, citing extensive war crimes and acts of genocide as direct consequences of its actions. This stark accusation shows the gravity of Sudan's perspective on the external factors prolonging the devastating conflict.
Allegations of Emirati Support
The Sudanese ambassador asserted that Emirati support for the militia encompasses money, weapons, and mercenaries. This full support, the ambassador claimed, has been extensively documented by various credible bodies, including UN organizations, governmental and non-governmental organizations, international media outlets, and independent international investigation committees. The ambassador noted that such widespread documentation provides substantial evidence of the UAE's alleged role. This level of external backing, the ambassador emphasized, provides the military and financial resources that prevent the militia leaders from surrendering their weapons and ultimately ending the war, thereby prolonging the suffering of the Sudanese people. The ambassador also stated that, with the exception of the UAE, Arab countries generally support Sudanese state institutions and reject the creation of parallel entities or the division of Sudan. This distinction suggests a unified regional stance against fragmentation, with Abu Dhabi being identified as an outlier.
Sudan's Transitional Sovereign Council Chairman, Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, has made two significant visits to Algeria. His first visit was for the Arab Summit in early November 2023, followed by another visit in early 2024. These diplomatic engagements occurred in a context where Sudan historically provided key political and logistical support to Algerian revolutionaries during their armed struggle against colonialism, fostering a long-standing bond between the two nations. This historical solidarity forms a backdrop to the current diplomatic efforts. According to the ambassador, this external backing provides the military and financial resources that prevent the militia leaders from surrendering their weapons and ultimately ending the war. The ambassador’s statement shows the belief that without this external lifeline, the conflict would likely cease.
Sudan's Efforts for Peace and Sovereignty
The Sudanese ambassador stated that the armed forces have regained most of the country's territories, a significant achievement in their efforts to restore stability and control. The government of Sudan remains steadfastly committed to cooperating with humanitarian partners and facilitating the delivery of essential aid across the nation, recognizing the urgent needs of its population amidst the conflict. This commitment reflects a dual approach of military action to secure territory and humanitarian efforts to alleviate suffering.
Sudan has made concerted efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict, demonstrating its willingness to engage in diplomatic processes. These efforts include participating in the Jeddah Agreement in May 2023, an accord which the militia unfortunately did not adhere to, undermining the prospects for an early cessation of hostilities. In a further move towards resolution, Prime Minister Dr. Kamil Idris submitted a full initiative to the Security Council in December 2025, outlining a path forward for peace. This initiative aimed to present a clear and actionable framework for de-escalation and a return to stability, reflecting Sudan's proactive stance in seeking a diplomatic solution. President Abdel Fattah al-Burhan later announced arrangements for a full Sudanese political dialogue in late May 2026, signaling a commitment to inclusive political processes to determine the country's future. This planned dialogue shows the government's intention to involve various stakeholders in shaping Sudan's post-conflict governance and reconciliation efforts, aiming for a broad-based consensus on national direction.
In pursuit of justice and accountability, Sudan has also submitted extensive evidence and proof to both the Security Council and the International Court of Justice regarding the ongoing conflict. These submissions aim to bring international attention and legal scrutiny to the alleged perpetrators and their backers. The ambassador reiterated that the armed forces, supported by popular backing from the Sudanese populace, have successfully regained territories throughout the country. Only parts of Kordofan and Darfur states remain outside of their control, indicating significant progress in stabilizing the nation. This popular backing notes a unified national effort against the militia.
International and Regional Appeals
The Sudanese ambassador issued a strong call on the international community and global public opinion to condemn the alleged Emirati intervention in Sudan. The ambassador urged these international bodies to officially designate the militia as a terrorist organization, a move that would carry significant legal and political implications. Algeria has consistently supported Sudanese issues during its non-permanent membership in the Security Council and its membership in the African Union Peace and Security Council, demonstrating its solidarity with Sudan on the international stage. This consistent backing from Algeria has been key in amplifying Sudan's concerns and advocating for its sovereignty within key international forums. The ambassador stated that Sudanese state institutions are functioning in full harmony, encompassing both the Transitional Sovereign Council and the civilian government led by Dr. Kamil Idris, presenting a united front despite the ongoing challenges. This operational harmony is presented as evidence of the government's legitimacy and its capacity to govern effectively even amid the conflict.
Algeria's steadfast stance is deeply appreciated for its unwavering support of Sudan's sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity, and for its explicit rejection of the Rapid Support Forces terrorist militia, according to the ambassador. This alignment of views strengthens Sudan's diplomatic position. The ambassador expressed hope for greater Algerian involvement in neutralizing some neighboring African countries that are perceived to be influenced by Emirati financial support to aid the militia, suggesting a need for regional diplomatic pressure. The ambassador also voiced hope for Algerian support in restoring Sudan's membership in the African Union, a critical step for Sudan's reintegration into continental affairs and its ability to participate in regional peace and security initiatives. The ambassador emphasized that the restoration of membership would allow Sudan to contribute actively to regional stability and address shared challenges, reinforcing its role within the African community.
Broader Context and Consequences
The ambassador asserted that the conflict in Sudan would cease immediately if Abu Dhabi halted its "unlimited support" to the militia. This claim shows the Sudanese government's firm belief that external backing is the primary driver of the ongoing hostilities and that its cessation would lead to a swift end to the violence. The ambassador also alleged that certain countries are profiting significantly by selling weapons at inflated prices to Abu Dhabi, which subsequently channels these arms to the militia. This statement suggests a broader network of actors involved in sustaining the conflict through a lucrative arms trade, extending the chain of responsibility beyond direct support. Additionally, the ambassador criticized the African Union's decision to freeze Sudan's membership, describing it as premature and counterproductive. The ambassador indicated that the move did not allow adequate time for constructive dialogue or for fact-finding missions to properly assess the complex situation on the ground, suggesting that the decision was made without a full understanding of the realities faced by the Sudanese government and its people. This perspective notes Sudan's contention that international bodies acted hastily in their response to the crisis, potentially isolating Sudan at a critical juncture.