Morocco has reportedly removed diplomatic representation barriers with Israel, metaphorically discarding keys and locks into the Atlantic Ocean, according to reports. These actions are likened to Morocco metaphorically throwing away keys and locks into the Atlantic Ocean, signifying a profound shift in its diplomatic stance. This development suggests Israel has effectively colonized the kingdom "without firing a single shot," a claim that shows the perceived ease with which this new relationship has been established. The Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita and his Israeli counterpart Gideon Sa'ar were observed exchanging glances, whispers, smiles, and a "terrible silence," during an unspecified encounter, indicating a significant shift in diplomatic interactions. The reported removal of these barriers suggests a complete opening of diplomatic channels, a move that critics view as highly consequential.
Defining the Unnatural Bond
Between Morocco and Israel, there is reportedly no common language, geography, religion, ethnicity, interest, or goal. This stark absence of shared foundational elements leads to the characterization of their relationship as an unnatural bond. The expansion of diplomatic representation between the two entities has been characterized as a repetitive chewing of cud, implying a cycle of engagement that lacks genuine substance or mutual benefit. Given the profound differences, the deepening of ties raises questions about the underlying motivations and long-term implications for both nations.
Israeli leaders consider their nation a great power, comparable to Russia and America, and stronger than European countries, according to various claims. These leaders have also stated they do not need normalization with weak Arab countries and have referred to those who sought diplomatic relations as 'baboons'. This self-perception and dismissive attitude towards Arab nations highlight a perceived power imbalance that shapes their approach to foreign relations. Colonization is defined as the control of a strong state over a weak country by military or political force to plunder its wealth and exploit its human and natural resources. This definition provides a critical lens through which to examine the burgeoning relationship between Morocco and Israel, particularly in light of Israeli leaders' asserted dominance and their views on "weak Arab countries."
The Reality of Israeli Colonization
The current situation in Morocco has been described as a full-fledged Israeli colonization. This colonization is reportedly occurring without resistance, revolution, or even complaint from within the country, a phenomenon that raises significant concerns among observers. Some opponents of the Moroccan regime abroad suggest that certain Moroccans wish for explicit Israeli colonization, believing it could save them from perceived humiliation under the current monarchy. This controversial perspective notes deep-seated discontent and a desperate search for alternatives to the existing political structure. The claim that Israel has managed to colonize a kingdom without firing a single shot further emphasizes the non-military, yet potent, nature of this perceived control.
The relationship between Morocco and Israel is characterized by claims that the UAE has become a blank check for Netanyahu, while Morocco has become a laboratory for Israeli agricultural, military, and espionage experiments. This suggests a transactional relationship where Morocco's resources and strategic position are being utilized for Israeli interests. The current ties specifically involve the alleged colonization of agricultural land, real estate, and decision-making processes within Morocco. This detailed accusation points to a multifaceted form of influence, extending beyond mere diplomatic exchanges to tangible control over key sectors and internal governance.
Critique and Consequences
The relationship between Morocco and Israel has been characterized as one where Israel perceives Morocco as an extension of its own entity, making Morocco vulnerable to colonization, humiliation, and subservience. This perception suggests a fundamental imbalance of power and intent within the bilateral relationship. Critics assert that the only beneficiary in this bilateral relationship is Israel, reinforcing the idea that Morocco's engagement serves primarily Israeli strategic and economic objectives. Morocco is described as being unwilling to hold an oppressor accountable, particularly one reportedly committing genocide against a population sharing its language and religion. This critique shows a moral dilemma, suggesting that Morocco's diplomatic alignment with Israel comes at the cost of solidarity with a culturally and religiously kindred people. The claim that Israel is the sole winner in this arrangement suggests a one-sided benefit, with Morocco potentially incurring significant long-term costs in terms of sovereignty and moral standing.